Legal or procedural basis
Sections 7 and 10, together with the terms of the relevant Award.

Inspection and evidence-led review of alleged damage, making-good proposals and compensation questions.
Owners dealing with damage concerns during or after notifiable works.
Damage questions should begin with evidence: the pre-work condition, timing, location, construction records and the terms of the Award. A surveyor can inspect and address matters within the statutory process, while complex causation or legal claims may need other specialists.
Sections 7 and 10, together with the terms of the relevant Award.
Owners dealing with damage concerns during or after notifiable works.
The Act’s requirements and any boundary procedure depend on the actual documents, ownership and site relationships. These are the usual working stages.
Document the alleged damage, timing and surrounding work before evidence changes.
Compare current condition with the Schedule, Award and construction records and identify any specialist input needed.
Consider making good, payment in lieu or further determination within the surveyors’ jurisdiction.
General information only. Advice on a particular property requires the relevant documents and facts.
No. Timing, location, prior condition, movement and construction evidence all matter. Conclusions should remain within the surveyor’s expertise.
The Act contains rights relating to compensation and making good, but the correct route depends on the facts and Award. Specific advice should be obtained.
These public sources support the general explanations on this page. They do not replace advice on the facts of a particular property.
Describe the work, notice or concern and tell us which drawings or documents you already have. You do not need to decide the statutory route before contacting the team.
Call 020 8050 0443